When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians). They were death
marched to reservations in the deserts or to other wasteland to make room
for whites. Just look at Arizona. The whites took Flagstaff and "gave"
the luckless Indians Tuba City. Visit both places so you will see the
truth for yourselves.
Carrying over the same logic, we need oil, so we’ll take what we want and
throw the natives out. Knocking over Saudi Arabia is the easiest. They
have no army to speak about, power is concentrated in a few and their
population is small. We confiscate their oil fields and the gas crisis is
over. As for the Saudis, deport them to Iraq where they’ll be finished off
in short order.
Feeling guilty? Why? We’ve done it before and can and will do it again.
It’s nothing more than survival of the fittest.
On May 23, 3:52 pm, George Orwell <nob…@mixmaster.it> wrote:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
> conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians). They were death
> marched to reservations in the deserts or to other wasteland to make room
> for whites. Just look at Arizona. The whites took Flagstaff and "gave"
> the luckless Indians Tuba City. Visit both places so you will see the
> truth for yourselves.
> Carrying over the same logic, we need oil, so we’ll take what we want and
> throw the natives out. Knocking over Saudi Arabia is the easiest. They
> have no army to speak about, power is concentrated in a few and their
> population is small. We confiscate their oil fields and the gas crisis is
> over. As for the Saudis, deport them to Iraq where they’ll be finished off
> in short order.
> Feeling guilty? Why? We’ve done it before and can and will do it again.
> It’s nothing more than survival of the fittest.
Great idea. Only one correction: Saudis need not to be "deported" but
"resettled" to Iraq . Also, the idea is not original: Stalin
resettled tens of millions of Kalmuks, Armenians, Poles, and other
nationalities just for a hell of it. And because he did not have an
advantage of hi-tech ( cattle cars were used), and- due to the fact
that the Russian climate for most of the year is not really favorable
for survival of starved , half-naked human beings – 80% of them or so
didnot even make it to destination points..
"George Orwell" <nob…@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:2c581793e327150c77b115fa777ffbc7@mixmaster.it…
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
> conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians). They were death
> marched to reservations in the deserts or to other wasteland to make room
> for whites. Just look at Arizona. The whites took Flagstaff and "gave"
> the luckless Indians Tuba City. Visit both places so you will see the
> truth for yourselves.
> Carrying over the same logic, we need oil, so we’ll take what we want and
> throw the natives out. Knocking over Saudi Arabia is the easiest. They
> have no army to speak about, power is concentrated in a few and their
> population is small. We confiscate their oil fields and the gas crisis is
> over. As for the Saudis, deport them to Iraq where they’ll be finished
> off
> in short order.
> Feeling guilty? Why? We’ve done it before and can and will do it again.
> It’s nothing more than survival of the fittest.
I pray the Thought Police come get you.
Please do not feed the troll.
On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:52:55 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
<nob…@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
>conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians).
snip
>Feeling guilty? Why? We’ve done it before and can and will do it again.
>It’s nothing more than survival of the fittest.
Who IS this guy????
—
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 000742-1, 05/22/2007
Tested on: 5/23/2007 7:31:00 PM
avast! – copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
Must be Me wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:52:55 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
> <nob…@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>> When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
>> conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians).
> snip
>> Feeling guilty? Why? We’ve done it before and can and will do it again.
>> It’s nothing more than survival of the fittest.
> Who IS this guy????
A troll.
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
> —
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 000742-1, 05/22/2007
> Tested on: 5/23/2007 7:31:00 PM
> avast! – copyright (c) 1988-2007 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
"Must be Me" <jackj^remove^…@windstream.net> wrote in message
news:gkj9531dhc29bqlhc0pv2ore8vv181mlto@4ax.com…
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:52:55 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell
> <nob…@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> >When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
> >conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians).
> snip
> >Feeling guilty? Why? We’ve done it before and can and will do it again.
> >It’s nothing more than survival of the fittest.
> Who IS this guy????
He’s just humping your leg..
George Orwell wrote:
> We confiscate their oil fields and the gas crisis is over.
LOL, right. Think Enron. Think peak oil. Think never *ending* war.
George Orwell wrote:
> When the United States needed new territory in the 19th Century, it
> conquered the Native American Aborigines (the Indians). They were death
> marched to reservations in the deserts or to other wasteland to make room
> for whites. Just look at Arizona. The whites took Flagstaff and "gave"
> the luckless Indians Tuba City. Visit both places so you will see the
> truth for yourselves.
> Carrying over the same logic, we need oil, so we’ll take what we want and
> throw the natives out. Knocking over Saudi Arabia is the easiest. They
> have no army to speak about, power is concentrated in a few and their
> population is small. We confiscate their oil fields and the gas crisis is
> over. As for the Saudis, deport them to Iraq where they’ll be finished off
> in short order.
That’s actually Cheney’s long term plan — overthrow Saddam, install a
US-friendly government in Iraq, ave it invade the eastern part of
Saudi Arabia, which is where all the oil is concentrated there and
where the vast majority of the population is Shiite, and drive the
Saudi ruling family westward into the desert and turn them into
bedouins again.
But plans don’t always work out well.
On Thu, 24 May 2007 18:57:11 -0500, " dbu.," <n…@einp.com> wrote:
>This is rich, VERY rich stuff. Could we somehow write a book and
>perhaps a movie later? Actually we could embellish this a bit more with
>some additional imaginative ideas, think and use all of your creative
>thoughts. I think this could be a winner and make us a lot of money.
>Include me in the deal and I will come up with some good ideas too.<snip>
What’s the matter, a probable scenario a little too scary for you?
It’s pretty much a well known fact that the Iraq thing was precisely
about that…setting up for a Saudi takeover, except Cheney-Monster
didn’t do his cultural homework well enough, and this little
Sunni-Shi’ite problem cropped up. Goes to show ol’ "Dickhead" isn’t
as competent as the pundits said he was.
Articles of Impeachment have been filed in the House again Cheney
already. Pray for that…or a defective stent.
"larry moe ‘n curly" <larrymoencu…@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1180047336.167707.144730@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com…
> That’s actually Cheney’s long term plan —
Amazing…nothing previously has indicated that this administration
had a "plan"